Cauchy’s Crazy Induction

Standard

Many people know about AM-GM inequality, we have that for any list of n nonnegative real numbers a_1, a_2, \ldots , a_n,

\sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k \geq n \sqrt[n]{\prod_{k=1}^{n}a_k}

While reading about Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean Inequality’s proof at Wikipedia, I came across the reference to Augustin Louis Cauchy‘s original proof:

cp3

Cauchy, Augustin-Louis (1821). Cours d’analyse [source: https://archive.org/details/coursdanalysede00caucgoog ]

Here Cauchy used a crazy type of induction process, which can be stated as:

Step 1 : [The base case] Show that the statement is true for an integer .
Step 2: [The inductive step] This has two parts:

  • P(k) \Rightarrow P(2k)
  • P(k) \Rightarrow P(k-1)

Completing these two steps proves that the statement is true for all positive integers .

It has a very distinctive inductive step, and though it is rarely used, it is a perfect illustration of how flexible induction can be. The first part of the inductive step shows that the statement is true for larger and larger values of n . But that leaves a lot of gaps in between. The second part ensures that all the gaps are taken care of.

I became curious to know about other instances when we can use this from of induction. So here are some other theorems which can be proved using Cauchy’s Crazy Induction (for proof refer to [2] given at end of this post):

1)  Ky Fan inequality: If x_i with 0 \leq x_i \leq \frac{1}{2} for i = 1, \ldots, n are real numbers, then

(\prod_{i=1}^n \frac{x_i}{1-x_i})^{1/n}\leq \frac{\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{1-\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}

2) Cauchy’s Inequality or  Lagrange’s inequality :  Let  n\geq 1 and x_1,\ldots, x_n,y_1, \ldots, y_n be a set of 2n real numbers. Then

(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i)^2 \leq (\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2)(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i^2)

References:

[1] Forward-backward induction, The Math Forum @ Drexel 

[2] Francois Dubeau, “Cauchy and mathematical induction”, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 22 (1991), 965-969.

 

Advertisements

4 responses »

    • I love proof by contradiction. In words of G. H. Hardy:

      “Reductio ad absurdum, which Euclid loved so much, is one of a mathematician’s finest weapons. It is a far finer gambit than any chess play: a chess player may offer the sacrifice of a pawn or even a piece, but a mathematician offers the game. ”
      A Mathematician’s Apology (London 1941).

      Liked by 1 person

        • Interestingly, mathematicians like Cédric Villani, Harold Edwards…. are living counterexamples of following G. H. Hardy’s quote:

          “There is no scorn more profound, or on the whole more justifiable, than that of the men who make for the men who explain. Exposition, criticism, appreciation, is work for second-rate minds. “

          Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s