31-March-2015 is one of the few mathematically memorable days of my life. This was different from my routine. Today I bunked all my theory classes as well as practical class at NISER. I walked in streets along with SSN (my batch-mate) searching for an address in hot-baked-afternoon. That address was of Prof. Swadhin Pattanayak. We interacted for about 2 hrs. We discussed various topics of analysis like: diverging series, summability, double sums, differential equations,….. He also shared his fascination of “how log tables were formed”, “how square-roots were calculated”, “beautification of electrodynamics by calculus”, “methods to calculate value of ”…… He has become too old, he takes time to write but still his love and passion for mathematics is young. Still he has mathematics research papers surrounding him and full of energy to learn and teach. At the end we shook hands, and I felt like shaking hands with some Super Star.
I love mathematics (click here for WHY?), and many other creations of Nature. But every time you add one of the creations of nature to your “LOVE LIST” , some unwanted (bitter) things creep in. I will talk what so far I have experience in case of (pure) Mathematics by quoting some big shots who feel same as me.
- Peter Sarnak says [in Advice to a Young Mathematician section of the Princeton Companion to Mathematics]
Doing research in mathematics is frustrating and if being frustrated is something you cannot get used to, then mathematics may not be an ideal occupation for you. Most of the time one is stuck, and if this is not the case for you, then either you are exceptionally talented or you are tackling problems that you knew how to solve before you started. There is room for some work of the latter kind, and it can be of a high quality, but most of the big breakthroughs are earned the hard way, with many false steps and long periods of little progress, or even negative progress. There are ways to make this aspect of research less unpleasant. Many people these days work jointly, which, besides the obvious advantage of bringing different expertise to bear on a problem, allows one to share the frustration. For most people this is a big positive (and in mathematics the corresponding sharing of the joy and credit on making a breakthrough has not, so far at least, led to many big fights in the way that it has in some other areas of science). I often advise students to try to have a range of problems at hand at any given moment. The least challenging should still be difficult enough that solving it will give you satisfaction (for without that, what is the point?) and with luck it will be of interest to others. Then you should have a range of more challenging problems, with the most difficult ones being central unsolved problems. One should attack these on and off over time, looking at them from different points of view. It is important to keep exposing oneself to the possibility of solving very difficult problems and perhaps benefiting from a bit of luck.
- Also Alain Connes says [in Advice to a Young Mathematician section of the Princeton Companion to Mathematics]
Mathematicians usually have a hard time explaining to their partner that the times when they work with most intensity are when they are lying down in the dark on a sofa. Unfortunately, with e-mail and the invasion of computer screens in all mathematical institutions, the opportunity to isolate oneself and concentrate is becoming rarer, and all the more valuable
- Donald R Weidman says [in Emotional Preils of Mathematics]
Second, the mathematician must risk frustration. Most of the time, in fact, he finds himself, after weeks or months of ceaseless searching, with exactly nothing: no results, no ideas, no energy. Since some of this time, at least, has been spent in total involvement, the resulting frustration is very nearly total. Certainly it seriously affects his attitude toward all other affairs. This factor is a more important hindrance than any other, I believe; to risk total frustration, and to be almost certain
to lose, is a psychological problem of the first rank.
We are mathematicians by choice. We chose the profession because we love the subject. Reading and assimilating deep results of masters and then solving some of our own small problems brings us pleasure to which nothing else compares much. Yet we live in a world populated mostly be non-mathematicians. We must survive and thrive in their midst. This brings
forth its own challenges and frustrations.
But what I & many other mathematicians feel as a compensation of this Bitterness of Loving Mathematics is:
- Love Teaching (it has it’s own bitterness) : Share, propagate and preach the beauty that you can see by teaching others. Enjoy teaching if it is a course of our choice and the class consists of a few eager, motivated, well-behaved students. That is only a dream. Often we must teach large classes of uninterested students who are there only for completing the requirements. But in spite of all this we must strive to teach, giving it our best and at the same time maintaining the standard of our subject. Compromises have no place here. We believe in teaching in a certain way and it can be fine-tuned depending upon the reactions of the students. But it should not prevent us from communicating the basic spirit of mathematics, especially the importance of logical enquiry. All aspects of mathematics, including history, biographies, motivation, definitions, lemmas, theorems, corollaries, proofs, examples, counterexamples, conjectures, construction, computation and applications can and should find a place in the classroom.
- Love some other art : No Comments…………..just read this : The Frustrated Mathematician: A Call to Artists by Michael Frantz.
- Love Travelling: Attend as any conferences, workshops etc. and keep moving. As Paul Erdős said :
Another roof, another proof